In a June 20, 2019 Technical Interpretation, CRA was asked whether a taxpayer legally adopting the child of his or her common-law partner would be eligible to claim the costs under the adoption expense tax credit ($16,255 @ 15% for 2019). CRA opined that the credit could be claimed by the adoptive parent, but not by the biological parent, despite the usual ability for spouses to split this credit. CRA also noted that the provincial adoption law would have to be reviewed to determine whether a step-parent could legally adopt the child. In this case, noted as being in Alberta, provincial law allows the claim.
ACTION ITEM: Ensure to provide receipts associated with the adoption of a step-child when delivering your personal tax information.
In a September 17, 2019 Tax Court of Canada case, at issue was the deductibility of vehicle expenses, and in particular, the portion of total vehicle use that was for employment purposes. While initially challenged by CRA, the Court eventually accepted the credit card statements as support for the amounts expended. The taxpayer held and produced a T2200 which indicated that motor vehicle expenditures were requirements of employment.
Taxpayer loses – vehicle expenses
The taxpayer had initially claimed 90% employment usage but later asserted that only 1,015 of her total 1,353 kilometres travelled (75%) were for employment purposes. This percentage is used to determine the portion of total vehicle expenses that can be deducted. The Court then noted that the total kilometres driven for the year were more likely approximately 10,000 based on the odometer readings listed on the third-party garage repair invoices provided throughout the year. As the reported employment kilometres (which were supported by a vehicle log) were about 10% of the total reported on the invoices, only 10% of expenses were allowed.
ACTION ITEM: In addition to employment/business travel logs, CRA may ask for support of total travel. Retain records that support total kilometres traveled such as repair receipts.
A November 5, 2019 Tax Court of Canada case reviewed the deductibility of employment expenses by a manager overseeing the Canadian sales force and operations of a multinational manufacturer of dental instruments and products. The taxpayer’s employer had no Canadian office, and she travelled extensively to meet with sales representatives, dealers and customers throughout Canada.
Expense of assistant
Almost half of the taxpayer’s claimed expenses, which exceeded $80,000, related to her husband’s role as her assistant. The Court noted that a deduction can be claimed for salary paid to an assistant, but that there were several problems with her claim, including the following:
No deduction was allowed for these costs.
ACTION ITEM: Support and documents are often requested by CRA when deductions against employment income are claimed. Ensure to retain all such support. If no T2200 has been provided for the current year, enquire with your employer as to whether one is available for the next.
For an employee to deduct travel or motor vehicle expenses against employment income, the employee must be normally required to work away from the employer’s place of business, be required to pay the travel expense under the contract of employment, and have a signed and completed T2200. Also, the employee cannot receive an allowance excluded from income.
In 2017, CRA began denying travel expenses claimed on the personal tax return of many employees who were also shareholders of the employer or related to a shareholder. After receiving concerns from stakeholders regarding this new assessing practice, CRA reversed their assessments, indicating that “clear guidelines for taxpayers and their representatives” were important to the Canadian self-assessment system and that additional consultation and guidance was needed in this area.
In September of 2019 CRA released the promised guidance. It noted that the following conditions had to be met for employment expenses incurred by shareholder-employees to be deductible:
When the employee is also a shareholder, the written contract may not be adequate, and the implied requirements may be more difficult to demonstrate. However, CRA noted that both of these conditions may be satisfied if the shareholder-employee can establish that the expenses are comparable to expenses incurred by employees (who are not shareholders or related to a shareholder) with similar duties at the company or at other businesses similar in size, industry and services provided.
ACTION ITEM: Instead of deducting amounts against employment income, consider whether it would be better for the company to reimburse expenses of shareholder-employees, or perhaps, pay a tax-free travel allowance. If amounts will continue to be paid personally, retain support that shows how the travel expenditures are reasonable as compared to those of other similar arm’s length workers.
In a June 7, 2019 Technical Interpretation, CRA commented on whether a CPP/EI ruling triggers follow-up assessing and review. These rulings often determine whether a worker is a contractor or employee, and therefore whether EI and/or CPP should be submitted to CRA. They also often consider whether an employee that is a family member of the owner is earning insurable amounts. Rulings can be initiated by the worker, the business, or another party with an interest, such as CRA.
CRA noted that after the completion of a ruling, a referral to the Trust Accounts Examination Division (often leading to a payroll audit) is not automatically sent. However, it is sent in situations such as where:
When a referral is received, an examination officer will contact the employer for an appointment to review the payroll books and records. Deduction and remittances for the period covered by the CPP/EI ruling will be confirmed and validated.
The officer will also review CRA’s database to determine whether there are any outstanding GST/HST returns. If found non-compliant, the GST/HST books and records will also be reviewed.
ACTION ITEM: If CRA challenges the categorization of a worker (employee vs. contractor), keep in mind that the implications of a reclassification could be significantly greater than the costs associated with the individual worker.
The tax on split income (TOSI) can subject various income sources, with taxable private corporation dividends being the most common, to personal tax at the highest marginal rate. One of the exceptions from TOSI occurs when the income recipient is actively engaged in the business. An individual will be deemed to be actively engaged in any year in which the individual works in the business at least an average of 20 hours per week during the portion of the taxation year that the business operates.
Statutory holidays, sick days, vacations
In an August 6, 2019 French Technical Interpretation, CRA opined that days that an individual is paid for time that they do not actually work (such as statutory holidays, sick days, and annual vacations) should not be considered hours worked for the computation. For example, if an individual is paid for five days for a week, but only actually works four days due a statutory holiday on one of the days, only four days of work should be considered in the computation.
Less than 20 hours required
In a June 7, 2019 Technical Interpretation, two spouses contributed an equal amount of effort to a business that only required 10 hours of weekly work (5 hours each per week). Where the 20-hour test is not met, the spouses may still not be subject to TOSI if they can demonstrate that they were actively engaged on a “regular, continuous and substantial basis”.
While it is a question of fact, CRA stated that it is possible for this exception to be available in this scenario. Consideration should be given to the ongoing nature and labour requirements of the business for the particular year. In general, whether an individual is actively involved in a business will depend on the time, work and energy that the individual spends on the business.
The more an individual is involved in the management or day-to-day operations, the more likely they will be sufficiently involved.
ACTION ITEM: Document the activities in which individuals who may be subject to TOSI are involved in the business. When tracking time, do not include paid hours in which the individual was not working.
In an August 29, 2019 Tax Court of Canada case, at issue was whether the taxpayer who operated a mobile home/RV park was eligible to claim the small business deduction for the 2012-2014 years. CRA argued that the taxpayer primarily earned its income from the rental of seasonal and extended seasonal campsites and the storage of RVs and, therefore, carried on a specified investment business. Specified investment businesses are not eligible for the small business tax rate. Instead, they are taxed at over 50% in all provinces and territories, although 20.67% may be refunded when dividends are paid.
The taxpayer argued that it carried on an active business providing a significant bundle of services that were integral to its operations.
The majority of the taxpayer’s revenue related to fees charged to seasonal and extended seasonal campers. While shorter-term rents to daily campers occurred, these were much less common.
Taxpayer loses
The Court found that the seasonal and extended seasonal campers were effectively paying to occupy a particular site for either 5 or 10 months of the year and often that, for the remainder of the year, the mobile home or RV was stored unoccupied on site. The Court ruled that the duration of the occupancy agreements in particular (seasonal and extended seasonal versus daily or weekly) suggested quite clearly that the principal purpose of the business was to derive rental income.
While the taxpayer provided other services including garbage pick-up, limited event planning, office hours and “on-call” availability, the Court found that the services and amenities offered did not reach the tipping point where the provision of services overcomes the provision of property. Instead, these features were used to entice customers such that the business could accomplish its principal purpose of earning rental income.
NOTE: Even if the principle purpose of the business was to earn rental income, an exception is available (making the small business rate available) if the business employs more than five full-time staff.
ACTION ITEM: This case may have applicability to all corporations in which there is limited activity. In such cases, consider whether the income results more from the services provided, or for the use of the property. Consider what support or evidence you have that ties income earned to services provided.
On December 16, 2019, the Department of Finance announced the climate action incentive payment amounts for 2020. These payments are associated with the provinces that are subject to the federal backstop legislation. The following amounts may be claimed on the 2019 personal tax returns:
| Category | Ontario | Manitoba | Saskatchewan | Alberta |
| Single adult/first adult in a couple | $224 | $243 | $405 | $444 |
| Second adult in a couple or first child of a single parent | $112 | $121 | $202 | $222 |
| Each child under 18 not already included above | $56 | $61 | $101 | $111 |
| Baseline example for family of four | $448 | $486 | $809 | $888 |
A 10% supplement is available for those that live in rural areas (communities outside of census metropolitan areas, CMAs).
The 2020 climate action incentive payment payable to eligible Albertans will reflect fuel charge proceeds generated over a 15-month period. This consists of three months (January – March 2020) with a carbon price of $20 per tonne, plus 12 months (April 2020 – March 2021) with a carbon price of $30.
Also note that no federal incentive payments will be available for residents of New Brunswick this year since it will introduce a provincial program commencing on April 1, 2020 which removes the applicability of the federal backstop legislation.
ACTION ITEM: Ensure that changes in family status (marriage, new children etc.) are included in your 2019 personal tax return to get the full benefit of the program. Also note that most other provinces have similar rebate/incentive programs in place.
On September 6, 2019, the IRS announced Relief Procedures for Certain Former Citizens, a new process to facilitate eligible individuals in becoming compliant with their U.S. tax obligations, in conjunction with renouncing their U.S. citizenship (IR-2019-151). There was no announced specified termination date; however, a closing date will be announced in the future.
Eligible individuals will be required to file U.S. tax returns, including all relevant disclosure filings, including financial account disclosures, for the year they renounce their citizenship and the five preceding years. Eligibility criteria include the following:
Assuming these criteria are met, no penalties or interest will apply, and any taxes payable for the six years, up to the $25,000 maximum, will be waived entirely. The individual will also be exempt from the “covered expatriate” rules, which could otherwise impose additional tax and filing requirements. However, the IRS will process submissions by non-eligible individuals under the ordinary rules, potentially attracting significant interest and/or penalty charges.
ACTION ITEM: Often, children of U.S. parents are surprised to learn that they too are considered U.S. persons and subject to U.S. taxation. This program may assist them in correcting their affairs and obligations.
The preceding information is for educational purposes only. As it is impossible to include all situations, circumstances and exceptions in a newsletter such as this, a further review should be done by a qualified professional.
No individual or organization involved in either the preparation or distribution of this letter accepts any contractual, tortious, or any other form of liability for its contents.
